Several people raised concern on way that the fresh panel appointment observe was given towards the meeting in which the long lasting fulfilling out of Mr Hlaudi Motsoeneng since COO taken place. Ms Geldenhuys is expected into whether or not she actually ever advised the brand new panel as to what court repercussions of the measures through the group meetings. Ms Geldenhuys will get point out that she was bullied from the group meetings however, she nonetheless had email at their discretion through which she you can expect to provides informed the new panel, though it was following the facts. Even though she conceded to help you paying attention that procedure for appointment away from Mr Motsoeneng due to a letter out of their lawyer was procedurally wrong, she don’t provide solid advice into panel however, refuted that she got over something completely wrong since the she had not took part in flouting principles. Ms Geldenhuys, in the event saying she ended up being bullied, declined you to definitely Mr Motsoeneng bullied the girl, alleging that it was low-executive panel professionals, instance Mr Krish Naidoo and you may Mr Nomvuyo Mhlakaza, that has bullied their.
He was expected when the he thought the cash spent of the SABC are from the social handbag; in the event that the guy directed senior executives to trust which they don’t account to those regarding SA; and you may on their connection with Mr Motsoeneng
She responded that the Minister had asked a report on brand new conduct out-of board members which she had reported towards insufficient attendance and you may insufficient collaboration around board users, however, it absolutely was never a study. The fresh Chairperson is actually unimpressed, and you will reminded Ms Geldenhuys you to she is significantly less than oath and you may bad to the Panel with regards to the Organizations Act, rather than new Minister. Ms Geldenhuys conceded you to definitely she are a hundred% browbeaten because of the previous SABC Panel chairperson, Ms Ellen Tshabalala. MPs asked and therefore faction of the panel Ms Geldenhuys belonged to help you, to which she answered you to definitely she is a separate individual.
The new Chairperson reprimanded the newest SABC about their high delegation proclaiming that the Panel never ever desired to look for which happens again on the taxpayers’ currency and classified it as fruitless and you may wasteful expenditure.
The fresh new SABC board chairperson, Prof Mbulaheni Maguvhe, appeared and try expected into the their tries to prevent otherwise reduce the fresh new parliamentary query ranging from his interdict app, the refusal to provide documents, along with his walk-from the seven December meeting. He was asked exactly who he think was money his judge will set you back and who’d made decision to consult outside lawyers to behave on the behalf of the new panel if board didn’t have good quorum so you can effect such as for instance a choice. He had been asked about new flouting of the ICASA governing towards the the latest SABC protest plan, the latest non-quorate fulfilling from Ms Bessie Tugwana since the acting COO; whether or not the guy voted toward conference regarding Mr Motsoeneng once the long lasting COO; in the disregarding the new corrective action of your own Societal Guardian and disregarding colleagues’ cautions contrary to the contravening out of plan and you can regarding the blurring the fresh new outlines involving the exec while the panel. He had been advised that witnesses up until the Committee reported you to definitely they’d been upset by SABC, new Minister and also the Board, a lot of just who were discharged, other people from just who was basically frozen unlawfully. He had been inquired about procurement placed into the hands out-of Mr Motsoeneng, causing R100 million becoming invested instead of pursuing the correct procurement process.
Appointment report
Prof Bongani Khumalo: former SABC Panel member The fresh new Chairperson launched your earliest witness might possibly be Prof Bongani Khumalo 
, previous SABC Board user. He advised Prof Khumalo that he’s required by laws to help you respond to the questions legally place so you’re able to him fully and you can satisfactorily. In addition, they are needed to generate one asked records concerning the the subject question of the new inquiry, in spite of the point that the answer or file you may incriminate your otherwise expose your to violent otherwise municipal procedures otherwise problems.